Medical Editorial Policy
How MedRound handles educational content.
Clear provenance and traceable corrections matter as much as a useful question bank.
Policy updated 5 October 2026Creation and import
Some educational content on MedRound may be created or refined with AI assistance. Structural checks help detect missing options, invalid answer indices and formatting problems. Editorial decisions and independent clinical review are separate steps; AI assistance does not constitute independent clinical review.
Starter flashcards are concise AI-assisted prompts related to established concepts in the bank. Independent clinical review remains pending; a related question ID records context, not a clinical endorsement. A card is withheld if its related question is quarantined, withdrawn, or changed by a reviewed edit.
Some previously empty imported records have AI-assisted supplementary explanations with independent clinical review pending. Original imported records are preserved, and additions are applied only while the question wording, choices and answer key still match.
An import-completeness check verifies that records were transferred. It is separate from a clinical accuracy review or a copyright assessment. We retain source information internally where available. Imported material and AI assistance do not by themselves establish copyright permission. Content-rights concerns can be sent through Contact for administrator review; a complaint does not automatically delete a question or its history.
Medical review
Review considers the stem, answer key, explanation, ambiguity and the relevance of each option. Software labels such as reviewed do not on their own prove independent medical review.
Named reviewers and review dates are shown only when a real review record supports them. No universal review date or specialist endorsement is implied.
Guidelines and references
Vaccination, screening, resuscitation, drug doses and treatment recommendations require particular care because guidance changes and differs between regions.
When verifying a clinical recommendation, reviewers should use current primary guidance and identify the organization and setting. A stored reference is not a guarantee that the linked guidance is still current.
Corrections and publishing
Learners can report a question from practice. Reports enter a private administrator queue with the question ID and context. Serious uncertainty can require withdrawal from practice pending review.
Edits should preserve a traceable record and should never change a review date merely to appear recent. Detailed clinical verification remains ongoing.
Operated by MedRound
Legal operator: YOUSIF ABDIN MOHAMED AHMED MOHAMED · Saudi Arabia
For support, corrections, technical issues, feedback, or content-rights concerns, contact MedRound at medround.support@gmail.com.